Neuroskeptic has an interesting post about a study that looked at the brain activity of radiologists while they read diagnostic images. Next we'll need a study of the brain activity of neuroscientists when they conduct neuroimaging experiments.

« November 2011 | Main | January 2012 »
Neuroskeptic has an interesting post about a study that looked at the brain activity of radiologists while they read diagnostic images. Next we'll need a study of the brain activity of neuroscientists when they conduct neuroimaging experiments.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/29/2011 at 04:22 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Recently posted to PhilPapers:
Matan Shelomi (forthcoming). Mad Scientist: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion. Science and Engineering Ethics:-. (Direct link)
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/29/2011 at 12:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
![]() |
Posted by NELB Staff on 12/22/2011 at 02:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Leona Deborah Jochnowitz has recently posted How Capital Jurors Respond to Mitigating Evidence of Defendant's Mental Illness, Retardation, and Situational Impairments: An Analysis of the Legal and Social Science Literature (Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 5, p. 839, 2011) to SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
This article provides a historical review and analysis of the legal and empirical literature regarding capital juror decision-making, focusing on how capital jurors respond to mitigating factors of mental health, cognitive, and situational impairments. The level of juror receptivity to mental evidence is explained through the perspective of various theories of capital juror decision-making. This article draws upon the precedents of the first contemporary systematic jury studies of the 1950s conducted by Chicago Jury Project researchers. It explores methodologies used to investigate juror decision-making. It analyzes studies on the effectiveness of mental health defenses in criminal trials, a subtopic of the jury research. It focuses on findings of the Capital Jury Project I, which furthered capital jury research through post-trial interviews with actual jurors in the 1990's. Thus, this article imparts a better understanding of how jurors perceive a defendant's extenuating mental disabilities, which may be also stigmatizing and aggravating.
(Via CrimProf Blog)
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/22/2011 at 06:16 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Big Questions in Free Will Project, based at FSU, is hosting a two-week summer seminar on free will for graduate students and recent graduate students (Ph.D. received no earlier than 2009). The Templeton-funded project covers most expenses and provides for a $1500 stipend at the end of the program for participating.
For questions and more information about how to apply, see here.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/18/2011 at 08:26 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
![]() |
Last Edition's Most Popular Article:
In The Popular Press:
|
||
|
Posted by NELB Staff on 12/16/2011 at 03:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Recently posted to SSRN:
"Neuroscience, Normativity, and Retributivism"
THE FUTURE OF PUNISHMENT, Thomas Nadelhoffer, ed., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1968552
MICHAEL S. PARDO, University of Alabama School of Law
DENNIS PATTERSON, European University Institute, Rutgers University School of Law, Camden, Swansea University School of Law
Advocates for the increased use of neuroscience in law have made bold and provocative claims about the power of neuroscientific discoveries to transform the criminal law in ways large and small. Perhaps the boldest and most provocative of these claims are made in an influential article by Joshua Greene and Jonathan Cohen. They claim that neuroscience will reveal that criminal defendants are not morally responsible for their actions and that this revelation will thereby undermine retributivist justifications for criminal punishment. In the process of resolving previously intractable debates between consequentialism and retributivism, neuroscience will also, they contend, resolve age-old debates about free will. In this essay, we discuss several serious problems with their argument. We maintain that no neuroscientific discoveries will lead to the sorts of changes predicted by Greene and Cohen and, even if they did, those changes would not be the product of neuroscientific insight but result from unwarranted and problematic inferences which ought to be resisted.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/12/2011 at 04:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Read the remarkable story here. Remarkable to say the least.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/10/2011 at 02:43 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
![]() |
Last Edition's Most Popular Article:
In The Popular Press:
|
||
|
Posted by NELB Staff on 12/08/2011 at 08:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Here is some updated schedule information (Download UpdatedSunyMemorySched) for the SUNY Downstate "Neuroethics of Memory" symposium this Friday (Dec. 9) in Manhattan. I posted registration information here.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/05/2011 at 05:32 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
On December 7, the European University Institute is sponsoring an event about the Albertani case in Italy. From the EUI website:
An Italian Court recently issued a ruling in a homicide case. The ruling attracted international attention, because brain imaging and genetic testing were admitted in Court as evidence of the defendant’s diminished responsibility. Five experts discuss the case with Dennis Patterson (EUI, Law Faculty) and Sofia Moratti (EUI, MW Fellow in Law).
Wednesday 7 December 2011 15:00 – 18:00
Sala Europa, Villa Schifanoia
You can find more information, including a detailed summary of the case, here.
Posted by Adam Kolber on 12/05/2011 at 05:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
![]() |
Last Edition's Most Popular Article:
In The Popular Press:
|
||
|
Posted by NELB Staff on 12/02/2011 at 12:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)