Here's a link to the Neurocritic on "Voodoo Correlations:Two Years Later." It has lots of interesting discussion and great links, not only about the "Voodoo Correlations" paper but also about the recent controversy over NASA's claim to have identified a life form that doesn't require phosphorus. In particular, the Neurocritic notes how the blogosphere has sped up discussion and analysis of scientific papers to sometimes breakneck speed.
(via the PEBS Neuroethics News Roundup)
Comments