Blog Editor


  • Copyright 2005-20012 by Adam Kolber
    All rights reserved.

« NYT: Personalized Psychopharmacology (Murphy) | Main | Dampening Memories from the Distant Past »


Of course, neuroethics it´s more than scanning the brain and their ussually related oddities (i.g. incidental findings, Illes 2005) or other associated problems (scanning as a tool for therapy and therefore preventing disease development with it´s ethical implications or invasion of privacy [cognitve liberty])

In relation to the use of fMRI as a lie detector i read in various volumes (including those published by the Dana foundation) that in this issue emerges what is called the "problem of memory". Perhaps one can detect when somone lies intentionally but if, for example, he mistakes to be sure about something but turns to be mistaken about it, then it is a problem with memory (the subject believes something with extreme confidence but turns to be false).
On the other hand, specific individuals can self-decieve themselves and passing undetected or just simply people may have an anomalous neural circuit similar to the one which tell us that is lying when in fact is not lying or statistical errors...

The comments to this entry are closed.